Agreed.  It would be nice if corrected coordinates could be queued like drafts and stored offline.  I was doing some multis this past weekend on the edge of wireless coverage and needed to wait as the app struggled and failed to update coordinates on geocaching.com.

Are the tile servers using the HTTP headers "correctly" to help you manage this? Its been a while since I looked at http headers but there were expires and cache-control and other headers.  Are those honored?   

One of my fears is getting someplace with no offline maps and the cache does not save me.

Love the idea.  As time has progressed for me storage on my phone has become cheaper and more abundant.  It has been a long time since I ran out of storage on my phone. I remember those days. They were not fun.

As this is 5 years old, is it still as important an issue? 

i modify caches names in the save dialog to let me do a text search fikter for the string to find important caches without a nrw feature.  This is not intended  as a down  ote merely a workaround.

yes i do meam the pgc challenge checker.  A menu or butt9n somewhere that brings me directly to the checker is the first level of integration.  

A further level of 8ntegration would be a green check or red stop sign on the info page. That m8ght be the button to hit to run the checker.  Or just shiw the graphic that the tampermonkey scri9ts do.

So while out doing a challenge run  folks 8n the car were always checking whether they had completed the challenge.  Some challenges did not have the link to the checker. This slowed folks way down.

Out at the MINGO madness event, being able to filter for caches with the field puzzle attribute was spectacular for finding the gadget caches out of all the ones around.  With the new caches being published we had to do this to the live map.  We had to use another APP!  

Updating the cache seems like the right thing to do.  It is not clear from the screenshot what was done as refreshing logs or the cache will result in the screen show.

Did you refresh the cache? Or did you just refresh the logs?  

Agree with malpas wanderer as I am not sure this is searchable.

Just a quick comment, I prefer the c:geo approach to the cachesense approach as it shows me more information about different lists rather than picking just one.